Guan Yu, styled as Yunchang, was a renowned military general in Chinese history, venerated as the "Martial Saint". However, there have been many controversies in history regarding the depreciation of Guan Yu by the descendants of Liu Bei. So, what is the truth behind these controversies? This article will reveal the mystery based on historical materials.

Firstly, the depreciation of Guan Yu by Liu Bei's descendants. According to the "Records of the Three Kingdoms", Liu Bei entrusted his son Liu Shan to Zhuge Liang and Guan Yu before his death. However, after Liu Bei's death, Guan Yu was killed due to disputes with the Eastern Wu Kingdom. Subsequently, Liu Shan succeeded the throne and became the second emperor of Shu Han. Under Liu Shan's rule, Shu Han gradually declined. Some people believe that this was caused by Liu Shan's depreciation of Guan Yu.

Secondly, an analysis of the historical truth.

1. Liu Shan's attitude towards Guan Yu

Although Shu Han's national strength gradually declined during Liu Shan's reign, there was no apparent depreciation of Guan Yu from him. On the contrary, after Guan Yu's death, Liu Shan posthumously honored Guan Yu as the "Loyal and Righteous Marquis" and established a temple in Chengdu to commemorate him. Additionally, Liu Shan repeatedly consulted Zhuge Liang on how to govern the country and revive Shu Han. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that Liu Shan had any depreciating remarks about Guan Yu.

2. The reasons for Shu Han's decline

The decline of Shu Han was not solely due to Liu Shan's depreciation of Guan Yu. In fact, it was the result of multiple factors. Firstly, Shu Han's geographical location was relatively remote, with limited resources. Secondly, its military strength was relatively weak, making it difficult to compete with the Cao Wei and Eastern Wu Kingdoms. Lastly, there were also issues with Shu Han's political system, such as eunuch tyranny. Therefore, blaming Shu Han's decline solely on Liu Shan's depreciation of Guan Yu is undoubtedly one-sided.

Thirdly, the conclusion.

In summary, the claim that Liu Bei's descendants depreciated Guan Yu does not align with historical facts. The decline of Shu Han was the result of various factors, rather than solely due to Liu Shan's depreciation of Guan Yu. Therefore, when evaluating historical figures, we should objectively and impartially assess their actions and achievements, avoiding the one-sided attribution of blame to individuals.

　　Disclaimer: The above content is sourced from the internet and the copyright belongs to the original author. If there is any infringement of your original copyright, please inform us and we will delete the relevant content as soon as possible.