Yu Huaji, a name deeply imprinted in the history of ancient China. He was a ruler with extremely high intelligence and profound contemplation. However, at a crucial moment, he chose to give up the opportunity to hold the emperor hostage to command the vassals. So, why didn't Yu Huaji want to hold the emperor hostage to command the vassals? What was he thinking?

Firstly, we need to understand that holding the emperor hostage to command the vassals is a political strategy, whose purpose is to achieve the unification of the country by controlling the emperor. However, this strategy is not without risks. Once failed, it may provoke resistance from all parties and even lead to one's own destruction. Yu Huaji was an extremely shrewd person who clearly recognized this.

Secondly, Yu Huaji was a person with profound Confucian thought. He believed that holding the emperor hostage to command the vassals was an infringement of imperial power and a violation of Confucian ethics. He was unwilling to do something that violated his beliefs for personal power desires.

Moreover, Yu Huaji was also a person with a high sense of responsibility. He knew that if he held the emperor hostage to command the vassals, he would have to bear the responsibility of maintaining national stability and protecting people's lives. However, he believed that he did not have this ability. He was unwilling to bring disaster to the people because of his ambition.

Lastly, Yu Huaji was also a person with lofty aspirations. He hoped to achieve the prosperity and strength of the country through his own efforts. However, he knew that holding the emperor hostage to command the vassals could not help him achieve this goal. On the contrary, it might make him lose the support of the people.

In summary, the reason why Yu Huaji was unwilling to hold the emperor hostage to command the vassals was because he had profound political wisdom, profound Confucian thought, a high sense of responsibility, and lofty aspirations. Although his choice may have seemed like a compromise at the time, in the long run, it was a responsible manifestation of himself, the country, and the people.

　　Disclaimer: The above content is sourced from the internet and the copyright belongs to the original author. If there is any infringement of your original copyright, please inform us and we will delete the relevant content as soon as possible.