What was the rift between him and Han Xianchu? Why did the working group's talks end in vain? General Han Xianchu was an outstanding general of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, who excelled in the War of Resistance Against Japan and the Liberation War, and was known as the "God of War". However, in his work with a certain individual, there was a rift between them, leading to the failure of the working group's talks. So, what was the rift between this person and Han Xianchu? Why did the working group's talks end in vain? This person was Li Tianyou, a lieutenant general of the Chinese People's Liberation Army and also a comrade-in-arms and colleague of Han Xianchu. In their work, Li Tianyou and Han Xianchu had some differences and contradictions, which ultimately led to the failure of the working group's talks. The rift between Li Tianyou and Han Xianchu stemmed from their different work assignments. Han Xianchu was mainly responsible for military command and operational planning, while Li Tianyou was responsible for political work and army construction. Because their work areas were different, they often had different perspectives and approaches when dealing with issues. For example, during a certain military operation, Han Xianchu believed that a rapid attack strategy should be adopted, while Li Tianyou thought that political negotiations and gaining popular support should come first. In this situation, they developed differences and contradictions, ultimately leading to the failure of the working group's talks. Besides the difference in work assignments, their personal characteristics and styles of handling affairs also differed greatly. Han Xianchu had a generous personality and liked to take risks and attack, while Li Tianyou had a cautious personality and focused on details and quality. Due to their differing personalities and styles, they often had different perspectives and approaches when dealing with issues. For instance, during a certain political task, Han Xianchu believed that tough measures should be taken, while Li Tianyou thought that gentle communication and negotiation should come first. In this situation, they developed differences and contradictions, ultimately leading to the failure of the working group's talks. Apart from the above two reasons, there were also some other factors that contributed to the failure of the working group's talks. For example, there were misunderstandings and suspicions between them on certain issues, or there were problems with their personal emotions and private relationships. These issues could potentially lead to rifts and contradictions in their work, thereby affecting the effectiveness of the working group's talks. In conclusion, the rift between Han Xianchu and Li Tianyou was mainly caused by differences in work assignments and personal characteristics and styles of handling affairs. Because of their differing work areas and personal characteristics, they often had different perspectives and approaches when dealing with issues. This led to rifts and contradictions between them, which in turn affected the effectiveness of the working group's talks. To avoid such situations, we need to strengthen communication and collaboration, and enhance mutual trust and understanding. We can increase opportunities for interaction and exchange to enhance mutual understanding and trust. At the same time, we can also reduce differences and contradictions by learning to listen and respect each other's opinions and ideas. Only by doing so can we better cooperate and jointly promote the progress of our work.

　　Disclaimer: The above content is sourced from the internet and the copyright belongs to the original author. If there is any infringement of your original copyright, please inform us and we will delete the relevant content as soon as possible.